A couple panel-presentations ago, the comparison
between Dana and the Middle Passage was mentioned (I don’t really remember if
it was from an article topic or if it just arose from discussion separately). I had never
really thought of it before, but after some contemplation I have concluded that
it does make sense. Whether the comparison was intended by Butler or not, it is
a reasonable interpretation that actually helped me to clarify some of Dana’s
traits. Looking at characters with a new perspective always has the potential
to help.
The Middle Passage involved the trade of massive numbers of
Africans into the Americas, and the treatment of the Africans was far from kind.
They were rudely crammed into ships and not given sanitary conditions or space.
In other words, they had no control. They had absolutely no voice in the
process, starting all the way from their capture continuing through their long
journey over the ocean and then in the Americas, until the end they had no say
whatsoever. If they tried to do anything about their predicament, they would
feel the harsh “no” to their opinion with a physical beating. Another aspect to
the human trade system was that of personal disbelief. Taken out of
their homes/home environment, soon-to-be slaves would be clueless as to what
would happen to them next, and the fact that they could not change future events
and that terrible things were happening to each of them played a role in this
fear and utter disbelief. So while I am making a general assumption here, it is
a safe one simply because of what the Africans had to endure.
Dana’s trips to the past overlap with both of these issues.
Octavia Butler makes it clear that Dana has no control over her time traveling.
Although not entirely explained why, it is left to the life choices of Rufus,
because whenever he is in serious trouble she is sent through time to save him
and then stay for some needed period. The unpredictability of her visits is the
cause for her not to drive and to carry a bag with materials for survival, she
doesn't know when she will be called. Once she is in the past, Dana can’t go
back willingly, she has to wait until some other force/person threatens her
life. Only on one occasion does she make a conscious choice that allows her to
return to her normal time setting, and that is when she slits her wrists. This
is just one possible interpretation, but this could analogous to a slave making
the extremely risky decision to escape. Dana slitting her wrists and a slave
trying to escape both stem from spite for a current life situation, and require
lots of pain and risk. The second factor I mentioned in the Middle Passage was a
questioning of why everything that happened to the Africans actually happened. Many
times Dana thinks of why she has to go through Rufus’s life, and why she has to
act the part of a slave. All she wants is the simple comfort of not having to
time travel and enjoying life with Kevin at home. But it doesn't work out that
way. Many times throughout the novel, after Rufus says something to Dana,
Butler writes for Dana, “I said nothing.” This phrase constantly appears, and I
think it implies Dana’s contemplation of why she has to deal with such
problems. It also indicates a little fear she has of consequences that could occur
if she doesn't agree with Rufus.
The significance of all this is that it amplifies the
suffering Dana has to go through. Once hearing of the comparison, initially,
the Middle Passage and Dana were linked in my mind because the journeys related
to both headed towards a world of slavery. Since the Middle Passage was obviously an
atrocious part of history, to make the connection between it and Dana puts such
a grave tone on her travels.
There are certainly productive parallels to explore between Dana's surreal situation, being forcibly taken from her home and dropped into the alien and brutal environment of antebellum slavery, and the Middle Passage. But the biggest difference--and in this sense it's probably impossible to find an *exact* parallel, which points out just what a unique atrocity the Middle Passage represents--comes with Dana's historical knowledge. She has *some* orientation with the slavery era; she has certain facts she can deploy to her advantage; she can speak the language. The Middle Passage was more utterly disorienting to the kidnapped Africans, and thus they were subjugated more fully and more forcibly than Dana has to be. She can always maintain some degree of detachment; this was clearly not an option for the earliest Africans to arrive on American shores. Ironically, *their* knowledge of history (i.e. African history) was useless in this foreign context, and it quickly became nearly erased from the cultural memory.
ReplyDeleteDana's journey is somewhat similar to the middle passage, but I would argue that the middle passage is much more of an abomination. The middle passage was a way for the slave trades to pick off the slaves because it was survival of the fittest. Each time she goes back, there are risks and she has to adapt to the new world; so its similar in that way. However, Dana's journey is kind of going in the opposite direction in that she's traveling back to discover her history whereas the middle passage was the beginning for what is one of the most darkest time in American history. I can see where you're coming from because they both symbolize the lost of control and will power, but they(Dana's journey and the middle passage) mean different things.
ReplyDelete